The Ultimate Law of Attraction Blog

Last year, when the law of attraction was again garnering mainstream headlines and coverage, it seemed to me that the only objection that was raised was that the law of attraction couldn’t really work because what about babies who are born with physical disabilities/born into abusive situations or poverty.

The theory apparently being that if the theory of LOA could be disproved in one arena (that of babies) then it surely couldn’t apply for any of us (a non-sensical view if ever I heard one and simply an excuse for carrying on with the status quo).

It seemed to be the only negative thing that could be levelled at the law of attraction by the professional cynics (who seem to think they speak for the rest of society).

Indeed, most of the people quoting this so-called exception to the law of attraction were middle class journalists/broadcasters who came from pretty privileged lifestyles and, to be honest, did not really need the law of attraction to improve their already enriched lifestyles. But that ‘beef’ is for another blog post.

But back to the baby theory.

I’m here to burst that bubble.

Yes it’s true that new born babies are unlikely to have the necessary thought patterns to choose or even dictate what they want or receive in life, but no one doubts the link between a mother and her new born baby.

That baby has spent upwards of 9 months in mother’s womb, sharing her vibration. Sharing all the ups and downs of the mother.

New-borns certainly share their mother’s nutrition, blood group, and indeed life force. So am I saying that new born babies inherit their mother’s vibration and ‘situation’ in life?

……Watch out for my next post for the final part of this article.

Yours,

GK

Bookmark To: